From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756335AbZETToT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756335AbZETToT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 20 May 2009 15:44:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755250AbZETToG
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 20 May 2009 15:44:06 -0400
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50784
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755477AbZETToF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 May 2009 15:44:05 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20090520.124403.159818618.davem@davemloft.net>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
       hskinnemoen@atmel.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1d4a3keqm.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
References: <20090521001928.4bf71911.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<m1d4a3keqm.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 07:53:21 -0700

> Grrr. Some days it feels like all of the good names are already taken.
> 
> How does this look for a solution to the name clash?

Give me a signoff so I can apply this Eric, thanks.