From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755376AbZETPpY (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 11:45:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754659AbZETPpN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 11:45:13 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:53317 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754209AbZETPpM (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 11:45:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:37:18 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Cornelia Huck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20] Sysfs cleanups Message-ID: <20090520153718.GB26111@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:09:43PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > The following patch series cleans up sysfs to the point where itq is > generally a good citizen of the vfs layer. The big theme is lazy > synchronization from the sysfs data structures to the vfs data > structures using the same techniques as most other distributed > filesystems. Hm, I only seem to have gotten patch 0/20, none of the actual patches. Did I somehow miss them? confused, greg k-h