From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752048AbZEYOB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 10:01:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751726AbZEYOBv (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 10:01:51 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]:63481 "EHLO faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322AbZEYOBu (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 10:01:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:01:51 +0200 From: Thomas Glanzmann To: Goswin von Brederlow Cc: Theodore Tso , Arjan van de Ven , tytso@thunk.org, LKML , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: zero out blocks of freed user data for operation a virtual machine environment Message-ID: <20090525140151.GE5534@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Glanzmann , Goswin von Brederlow , Theodore Tso , Arjan van de Ven , tytso@thunk.org, LKML , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20090524170045.GC24753@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20090524101551.57b706e9@infradead.org> <20090524173933.GD24753@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20090525120320.GA25908@mit.edu> <20090525123430.GA5534@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <87ab51qq91.fsf@frosties.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ab51qq91.fsf@frosties.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-05-02) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Goswin, > I could imagine a device mapper target that eats TRIM commands and > writes out zeroes instead. That should be easy to maintain outside or > inside the upstream kernel source. again an interesting option and for sure easy to handle. However what I'm really looking for is an option that gets upstream and will be incorperated in major distributions so that this option is available on every Linux distribution shipping in two years. However if this won't be the case I'm going to consider writing a device mapper target. Thomas