From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763277AbZE0PJ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 11:09:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763919AbZE0PI7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 11:08:59 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:53507 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762302AbZE0PI5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 11:08:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:04:35 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kay Sievers Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , holtmann@linux.intel.com, yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Allocate firmware id dynamically Message-ID: <20090527150435.GA31097@kroah.com> References: <20090526140423.GA14683@sortiz.org> <20090526132351.9805f1e8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090527115748.9ff0bad1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090527081732.GB3777@sortiz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:30:19AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:17, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > >> next-20090526:samples/firmware_class/firmware_sample_firmware_class.c > > Do I really need to fix this one too ? > > I does not compile since ages, it is totally outdated and uses the > long removed struct class_device. And we really don't need an example > for firmware loading, I think. This file should just be deleted. Yeah, I had plans to write it "properly", but it's at the end of my long TODO list :( I'll just go delete the thing instead. thanks, greg k-h