From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933001AbZE0TrT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 15:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760329AbZE0TrG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 15:47:06 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:56209 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755680AbZE0TrE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2009 15:47:04 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Benny Halevy Subject: Re: [Bug #13175] sata_nv incompatible with async scsi scan Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:47:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.30-rc6-rjw; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Arjan van de Ven , Arjan van de Ven , Jeff Garzik , Matthew Wilcox References: <200905262047.20823.rjw@sisk.pl> <4A1CEC3D.5030908@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <4A1CEC3D.5030908@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905272147.11506.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote: > On May. 26, 2009, 21:47 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote: > >> On May. 24, 2009, 22:31 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > >>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. > >>> > >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >>> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should > >>> be listed and let me know (either way). > >> Verified to still exist with 2.6.30-rc7 :-( > >> > >> [The bug description is misleading though. More testing > >> lead to post-kernel boot problems where initrd cannot find the sata > >> devices during its init phase] > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > What description would be better in your opinion? > > How about: initrd fails to find /dev/sda* (sata_nv) Thanks, updated. Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #13175] sata_nv incompatible with async scsi scan Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200905272147.11506.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200905262047.20823.rjw@sisk.pl> <4A1CEC3D.5030908@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A1CEC3D.5030908-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Benny Halevy Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Arjan van de Ven , Arjan van de Ven , Jeff Garzik , Matthew Wilcox On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote: > On May. 26, 2009, 21:47 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote: > >> On May. 24, 2009, 22:31 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > >>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. > >>> > >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >>> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should > >>> be listed and let me know (either way). > >> Verified to still exist with 2.6.30-rc7 :-( > >> > >> [The bug description is misleading though. More testing > >> lead to post-kernel boot problems where initrd cannot find the sata > >> devices during its init phase] > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > What description would be better in your opinion? > > How about: initrd fails to find /dev/sda* (sata_nv) Thanks, updated. Rafael