From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c-mpc: generate START condition after STOP caused by read i2c_msg Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:17:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20090528171726.GE3112@pengutronix.de> References: <4A124202.4010201@doredevelopment.dk> <20090526213351.GG23114@fluff.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="phCU5ROyZO6kBE05" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090526213351.GG23114-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Esben Haabendal , linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Esben Haabendal , Joakim Tjernlund List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Any blockers to get this accepted? >=20 > It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test > the driver before getting this merged. I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check @@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I would only test it and give a tested-by-tag if it doesn't break anything here. I think Joakim would be a good candidate for an acked-by . --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoexyYACgkQD27XaX1/VRu+mACdFGtX1DCt/RqzCoYSloa0zGw3 f0IAoKyRUlePitsTyVsWjV42yZ/Iob4I =oC0v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E7EDDDFC for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 03:17:41 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:17:26 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c-mpc: generate START condition after STOP caused by read i2c_msg Message-ID: <20090528171726.GE3112@pengutronix.de> References: <4A124202.4010201@doredevelopment.dk> <20090526213351.GG23114@fluff.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="phCU5ROyZO6kBE05" In-Reply-To: <20090526213351.GG23114@fluff.org.uk> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Esben Haabendal , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Esben Haabendal List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Any blockers to get this accepted? >=20 > It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test > the driver before getting this merged. I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check @@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I would only test it and give a tested-by-tag if it doesn't break anything here. I think Joakim would be a good candidate for an acked-by . --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoexyYACgkQD27XaX1/VRu+mACdFGtX1DCt/RqzCoYSloa0zGw3 f0IAoKyRUlePitsTyVsWjV42yZ/Iob4I =oC0v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05--