From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Run-time PM idea (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM: Rearrange core suspend code) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:54:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20090608065419.GA13568__24803.5795557827$1244444127$gmane$org@elte.hu> References: <200906072347.00580.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906072347.00580.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > +config PM_RUNTIME > + bool "Run-time PM core functionality" > + depends on PM > + ---help--- > + Enable functionality allowing I/O devices to be put into energy-saving > + (low power) states at run time (or autosuspended) after a specified > + period of inactivity and woken up in response to a hardware-generated > + wake-up event or a driver's request. > + > + Hardware support is generally required for this functionality to work > + and the bus type drivers of the buses the devices are on are > + responsibile for the actual handling of the autosuspend requests and > + wake-up events. Halleluya! :-) Ingo