From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGDpb-0008Or-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGDpY-0008OL-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59868 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGDpX-0008O5-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:39 -0400 Received: from naru.obs2.net ([84.20.150.76]:53301) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGDpW-0006LB-TW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:10:34 +0300 From: Riku Voipio Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Pending linux-user patches Message-ID: <20090615151033.GA26401@kos.to> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:12:06PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > On 6/12/09, riku.voipio@iki.fi wrote: > > From: Riku Voipio > > > > All the things in linux-user tree at the moment: > > > > https://git.maemo.org/projects/qemu/gitweb?p=qemu;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-user-for-upstream > > > > Since the maemo git hosting regrettably only provides https > > transport, you can download the git tree faster if you already > > have a git tree: > > > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/qemu.git > > cd qemu > > git remote add maemo https://git.maemo.org/projects/qemu > > git fetch maemo > > git checkout -b linux-user maemo/linux-user-for-upstream > > > > This tree is constantly rebased against upstream git HEAD, so avoid basing your > > work on this branch. > Constantly? It's already three days old. :-) More accurate would be "whenever there is updates in the upstream linux-user/ subdir that require rebasing", but that might give some people the impression that it is actually rabased quite rarely ;-) > Anyway, I pulled the patches with the intention of possibly committing > them. But it looks some of them are not ready yet. The "From:" fields were not intended as signed-off-by replacements, but rather to ensure that the authorship info is not lost. With the current mailer setup the email header "From:" on the patches sent to the mailing list shows my address, and I don't want to take anyones credit away. I'll have the look at the compiler warning, I didn't see any warnings on my build env(s) before mailing.