From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755948AbZFRBxq (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:53:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752877AbZFRBxf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:53:35 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51079 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752131AbZFRBxe (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:53:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090617.185338.20860763.davem@davemloft.net> To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, galak@kernel.crashing.org, leoli@freescale.com, ntl@pobox.com, sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tony@bakeyournoodle.com, michael@ellerman.id.au, Haiying.Wang@freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and reimplement Add SGMII support to UCC GETH From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Grant Likely Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:15:58 -0600 > (REPOST; I messed up an email address first time around and apparently my > posting got rejected. If you've already received this message, then > I apologize for the noise) > > Here is a fix for the build failure discovered during the 2.6.31 merge > window on ucc_geth.c. I decided to revert and reapply a fixed version > of the patch to make the new version easier to review and bisect if I > got the fixup wrong. I've compile tested both patches, but I do not have > hardware to run test. > > Haiying, please confirm that I haven't horribly trashed your hard work > with my changes. I've applied these to net-next-2.6, thanks! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B25CB724D for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:53:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090617.185338.20860763.davem@davemloft.net> To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and reimplement Add SGMII support to UCC GETH From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, ntl@pobox.com, Haiying.Wang@freescale.com, leoli@freescale.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Grant Likely Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:15:58 -0600 > (REPOST; I messed up an email address first time around and apparently my > posting got rejected. If you've already received this message, then > I apologize for the noise) > > Here is a fix for the build failure discovered during the 2.6.31 merge > window on ucc_geth.c. I decided to revert and reapply a fixed version > of the patch to make the new version easier to review and bisect if I > got the fixup wrong. I've compile tested both patches, but I do not have > hardware to run test. > > Haiying, please confirm that I haven't horribly trashed your hard work > with my changes. I've applied these to net-next-2.6, thanks!