From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [0/14] GRO: Lots of microoptimisations Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:08:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20090617080847.GA24504@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20090529162312.GA5191@neterion.com> <20090610054449.GB16984@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090612160926.GA4290@neterion.com> <20090612.164833.35888001.davem@davemloft.net> <20090616163547.GC5013@neterion.com> <20090616163856.GA17318@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090617080730.GA24410@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Benjamin LaHaise Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:58041 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754647AbZFQIIv (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:08:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090617080730.GA24410@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:07:30PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:38:56AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > I'm hoping to get onto this tomorrow. I think there's definitely > > something broken because there's no way GRO should be slower than > > GRO off. Slightly slower than LRO perhaps but surely not worse than > > not merging at all :) > > OK, I'm seeing the opposite :) Can you check your sender to see whether it's maxed out? That can play havoc when benchmarking the receiver. Also what are the raw numbers that you were getting? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt