All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:47:50 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906181647.51045.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090614064528.GA29130@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:15:28 pm Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:00:37PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > But re your comment that the 67 drivers using TX_BUSY are doing it
> > because of driver bugs, that's hard to believe.  It either hardly ever
> > happens (in which case just drop the packet), or it happens (in which
> > case we should handle it correctly).
>
> Most of them just do this:
>
> start_xmit:
>
> if (unlikely(queue is full)) {
> 	/* This should never happen. */
> 	return TX_BUSY;
> }

OK, so I did a rough audit, trying to figure out the "never happens" ones (N, 
could be kfree_skb(skb); return NETDEV_TX_OK) from the "will actually happen" 
ones (Y).

One question: can netif_queue_stopped() ever be true inside start_xmit?  Some 
drivers test that, like sun3lance.c.

Some have multiple returns, and some are unclear, but my best guess on a 
quickish reading is below.

Summary: we still have about 54 in-tree drivers which actually use 
NETDEV_TX_BUSY for normal paths.  Can I fix it now?

Thanks,
Rusty.

sungem.c: Y, N
fs_enet: N
mace.c: N
sh_eth.c: Y
de620.c: N
acenic.c: N (but goes through stupid hoops to avoid it)
e1000_main.c: N, Y
korina.c: N (Buggy: frees skb and returns TX_BUSY.)
sky2.c: N
cassini.c: N
ixgbe: N
b44.c: N, Y, Y (last two buggy: OOM, does not stop q)
macb.c: N
niu.c: N
smctr.c: N
olympic.c: Y
tms380tr.c: N
3c359.c: Y
lanstreamer.c: Y
lib8390.c: N
xirc2ps_cs.c: Y
smc91c92_cs.c: N
fmvj18x_cs.c: N (and buggy: can't happen AFAICT, and return 0 above?)
axnet_cs.c: N
smsc9420.c: N (and buggy: doesn't stop q)
mkiss.c: N (In xmit, can netif_running be false? Can netif_queue_stopped?)
skge.c: N
qlge: N, N, Y, N (buggy, OOM, does not stop q) 
chelsio: N
s2io.c: Y, Y?
macmace.c: N
3c505.c: Y
defxx.c: Y
myri10ge: N
sbni.c: Y
wanxl.c: N
cycx_x25.c: N, N, Y?
dlci.c: Y
qla3xxx.c: N, N (buggy, OOM, does not stop q), Y, N, 
tlan.c: Y
skfp.c: N
cs89x0.c: N
smc9194.c: N
fec_mpc52xx.c: N
mv643xx_eth.c: N (buggy, OOM, does not stop q)
ll_temac_main.c: Y, Y
netxen: Y
tsi108_eth.c: N, N
ni65.c: N
sunhme.c: N
atl1c.c: Y
ps3_gelic_net.c: Y
igbvf: N
csgb3.c: N
ks8695net.c: N, N (buggy, neither stops q, latter OOM)
ether3.c: N
at91_ether.c: N
bnx2x_main.c: N, N
dm9000.c: N
jme.c: N
3c537.c: Y (plus, leak on skb_padto fail)
arcnet.c: N?
3c59x.c: N
au1000_eth.c: Y
ixgb: N
de600.c: N, N, N
myri_sbus.c: Y
bnx2.c: N
atl1e: Y
sonic.c: who cares, that won't even compile... (missing semicolon)
sun3_82586.c: N
3c515.c: N
ibm_newemac.c: Y
donaubae.c:Y?, Y?, Y?, Y (but never stops q)
sir_dev.c: Y
au1k_ir.c: Y, Y
cpmac.c: N (no stop q, and leak on skb_padto fail), Y
davinci_emac.c: N (no stop q), Y
de2104x.c: N
uli526x.c: N
dmfe.c: N
xircom_cb.c: N
iwmc3200wifi: Y
orinoco: N, N, N, N (no stop q)
atmel.c: Y
p54common.c: N, Y?
arlan-main.c: Y?
libipw_tx.c: Y (no stop q), N (alloc failure)
hostap_80211_tx.c: Y
strip.c: N
wavelan.c: N, N, N
at76c50x-usb.c: N
libertas/tx.c: Y
ray_cs.c: N, N
airo.c: Y, Y, Y
plip.c: N, N, N (starts q, BUSY on too big pkt?)
ns83820.c: N, N
ehea: Y, Y (no stop q)
rionet.c: N
enic: N
sis900.c: N
starfire.c: Y
r6040.c: N
sun3lance.c: N, N
sfc: Y, N, Y
mac89x0.c: N
sb1250-mac.c: Y
pasemi_mac.c: Y
8139cp.c: N
e1000e: N
r8169.c: N?
sis190.c: N
e100.c: N
tg3.c: N, Y?, N
fec.c: N (no stop q), N
hamachi.c: N
forcedeth.c: Y, Y
vxge: Y?, Y?
ks8842.c: Y
spider_net.c: Y
igb: N
ewrk3.c: N
gianfar.c: Y
sunvnet.c: N
mlx4: Y
atlx: Y, Y

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-18  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 14:16 [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb Rusty Russell
2009-06-02  8:07 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 14:04   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 14:04   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02  8:07 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02  9:05 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02  9:05 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 13:55   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 23:45     ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 23:45     ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-03  3:17       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-08  5:22         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-13 12:30           ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-13 12:30           ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-14  6:45             ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-18  7:17               ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-18  7:17               ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-06-18  7:34                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-18  7:34                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19  3:37                   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19  4:36                     ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19  4:36                     ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 13:50                       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 14:10                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 14:10                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22  2:39                           ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-22  2:39                           ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 13:50                       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-22  5:46                       ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22  5:46                       ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22  7:34                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22  7:34                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22 13:41                           ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22 13:41                           ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22 18:25                           ` Matt Carlson
2009-06-22 18:25                           ` Matt Carlson
2009-06-23  2:54                             ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-23  2:54                             ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19  3:37                   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-14  6:45             ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-08  5:22         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-03  3:17       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 13:55   ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 14:16 Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906181647.51045.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.