From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] update Documentation/filesystems/Locking
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:22:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090619182237.GA11086@lst.de> (raw)
The rules for locking in many superblock operations has changed
significantly, so update the documentation for it. Also correct some
older updates and ommissions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/filesystems/Locking 2009-06-13 17:41:07.606841805 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/Documentation/filesystems/Locking 2009-06-13 17:47:42.400814653 +0200
@@ -109,27 +109,28 @@ prototypes:
locking rules:
All may block.
- BKL s_lock s_umount
-alloc_inode: no no no
-destroy_inode: no
-dirty_inode: no (must not sleep)
-write_inode: no
-drop_inode: no !!!inode_lock!!!
-delete_inode: no
-put_super: yes yes no
-write_super: no yes read
-sync_fs: no no read
-freeze_fs: ?
-unfreeze_fs: ?
-statfs: no no no
-remount_fs: yes yes maybe (see below)
-clear_inode: no
-umount_begin: yes no no
-show_options: no (vfsmount->sem)
-quota_read: no no no (see below)
-quota_write: no no no (see below)
+ None have BKL
+ s_umount
+alloc_inode:
+destroy_inode:
+dirty_inode: (must not sleep)
+write_inode:
+drop_inode: !!!inode_lock!!!
+delete_inode:
+put_super: write
+write_super: read
+sync_fs: read
+freeze_fs: read
+unfreeze_fs: read
+statfs: no
+remount_fs: maybe (see below)
+clear_inode:
+umount_begin: no
+show_options: no (namespace_sem)
+quota_read: no (see below)
+quota_write: no (see below)
-->remount_fs() will have the s_umount lock if it's already mounted.
+->remount_fs() will have the s_umount exclusive lock if it's already mounted.
When called from get_sb_single, it does NOT have the s_umount lock.
->quota_read() and ->quota_write() functions are both guaranteed to
be the only ones operating on the quota file by the quota code (via
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 18:22 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-18 21:07 [PATCH] Update Documentation/filesystems/Locking Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090619182237.GA11086@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.