From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [patch update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: <200906272352.42022.rjw__41470.5593059354$1246139583$gmane$org@sisk.pl> References: <200906140023.36147.rjw@sisk.pl> <200906150057.32424.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090624150400.GG1784@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090624150400.GG1784@ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Greg KH , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Magnus Damm , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 June 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > +2. Run-time PM Helper Functions and Device Fields > > + > > +The following helper functions are defined in drivers/base/power/runtime.c > > +and include/linux/pm_runtime.h: > > + > > +* void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev); > > +* int pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_request_suspend(struct device *dev, unsigned long delay); > > +* int pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_request_resume(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_cancel_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_cancel_runtime_resume(struct device *dev); > > +* void pm_suspend_check_children(struct device *dev, bool enable); > > Those *s look confusingly like pointers. Remove them? >>From the doc? OK, I can use another character. :-) Best, Rafael