From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756869AbZF2NNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:13:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754307AbZF2NNk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:13:40 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:33371 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753504AbZF2NNj (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:13:39 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,309,1243839600"; d="scan'208";a="159581684" Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:13:27 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: Ronald Moesbergen , Andrew Morton , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" , "Alan.Brunelle@hp.com" , "hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "jens.axboe@oracle.com" , "randy.dunlap@oracle.com" , Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev Message-ID: <20090629131326.GA23668@localhost> References: <20090606233056.7B9F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090606224538.GA6173@localhost> <20090618120436.ad3196e3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090620035504.GA19516@localhost> <4A3CD62B.1020407@vlnb.net> <20090629093423.GB1315@localhost> <4A489DAC.7000007@vlnb.net> <20090629125434.GA8416@localhost> <4A48BBF9.6050408@vlnb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A48BBF9.6050408@vlnb.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:04:57PM +0800, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Wu Fengguang, on 06/29/2009 04:54 PM wrote: > > > > Why not 2.6.30? :) > > We started with 2.6.29, so why not complete with it (to save additional > Ronald's effort to move on 2.6.30)? OK, that's fair enough. Fengguang