From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:41:52 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] I2C Add initial support for TWL4030
In-Reply-To: <4A64350B.4060602@denx.de>
References: <1244638432-30893-1-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
	<1244638432-30893-2-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
	<1244638432-30893-3-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com>
	<20090719091944.4B70C832E416@gemini.denx.de>
	<4A633A57.9060002@denx.de> <4A6352A7.7080307@windriver.com>
	<4A64350B.4060602@denx.de>
Message-ID: <20090722214152.GI5890@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11:12 Mon 20 Jul     , Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> 
> Tom wrote:
> > Omap2 is still pending.
> > I was hoping to help Richard out with this last week but he was on travel.
> > 
> > There is not much more I think I can do wrt omap2.
> > All my targets are omap3.
> > The nearest I can find online is the nokia n8xx which uses a another 
> > bootloader.
> > 
> > The options as I see them are.
> > 
> > 1. Get a pass on omap2 testing
> > 2. Rewrite i2c init to have a omap3 specific init
> > 3. Hack n8xx and try to convience you the results are reasonable
> > 4. Wait for omap2 testing.
> > 
> > I vote for #1.
> 
> Hmm.. because I think this patches go through Jean-Christophe he has
> to decide if this is acceptable.
we will not get a pass on the omap2
but we will do this in a second step as agree with Nishanth

Best Regards,
J.