All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:17:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090728141740.44d53b68@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090728223504.6a6ae8e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:29:11 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I need to look at the actual diff, but the combination looks completely
> > bogus unless I'm misreading the fixup which is possible.
> 
> Below is the actual patch from the usb.current tree.

Thanks - ok that is probably safe. The change I was worried about (the
error paths not adjusting port->count are ok as it gets zeroed within the
mutex)

Not sure its safe versus hangup but neither was the old code 8)

Oliver: I'll send you an alternative patch later today/tomorrow that uses
the ASYNC flags.

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-28 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-28  4:01 linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-28 10:26 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 12:10   ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-28 12:29     ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 12:35       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-28 13:17         ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-07-28 16:32           ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 16:34             ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 19:21               ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-28 19:24                 ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-09  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-09 23:19 ` Greg KH
2009-07-10  0:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-10  0:13     ` Greg KH
2009-04-23  4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-23  4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-23  4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22  3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22 15:50 ` Alan Stern
2009-04-22 16:30   ` Alan Cox
2009-04-22 16:38     ` Greg KH
2009-04-28  4:42       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-28  4:58         ` Greg KH
2009-04-28  6:45           ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-12  4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-12  9:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-12 11:02   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090728141740.44d53b68@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.