From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Getz Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:16:20 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC 0/3] uboot-doc User's Manual Generation Tool In-Reply-To: <20090728212755.B4B00832E416@gemini.denx.de> References: <1248813631.3915.102.camel@johns> <20090728212755.B4B00832E416@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <200907281816.20897.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue 28 Jul 2009 17:27, Wolfgang Denk pondered: > Dear John, > > in message <1248813631.3915.102.camel@johns> you wrote: > > > > It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates > > the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I > > Correct. And the DULG itself is a wiki (TWiki at the moment, to be > converted to Foswiki ASAP) based framework which holds the "static" > parts of the documentation. While we are on the topics of wikis, and U-Boot docs, can we discuss the license? http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/Introduction#Section_2.1. Since it is "is not permitted to sell this document or the derivative work or to include it into any package or distribution that is not freely available to everybody." Not meaning to interpret licensing, but to me that means I can't copy/paste sections into end product documentation, and ship the product for a fee... Was that the intent?