From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: HVM dropped packets Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:52:07 +0300 Message-ID: <20090826055207.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090825191057.GD19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090825201627.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Nathan Stratton Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:52:23PM -0500, Nathan Stratton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: >=20 > >Well I guess then your only option is to use stubdoms. >=20 > Any way to figure out what causes the overruns on tap and drops on vif?= If=20 > I am using tap for HVM why is there even a vif? >=20 How's your CPU usage?=20 I bet the drops are caused by the low performance of Qemu nic _emulation_= . -- Pasi > >Beware there's a bug (qemu memleak) in xen 3.4.1 related to stubdoms a= nd=20 > >heavy io > >on hvm guests in general:=20 > >http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-08/msg00335.ht= ml >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > -Nathan