From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgTi6-0005ca-VM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:23:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgTi2-0005c2-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:23:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59690 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MgTi2-0005bz-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:23:26 -0400 Received: from ottmail.xandros.com ([142.46.212.35]:45927) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgTi2-0001Z9-4o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:23:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:23:21 -0400 From: Stephen Depooter Message-ID: <200908262123.21488.stephend@xandros.com> In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80908261809m68c08666od2fa8aecec3dd91a@mail.gmail.com> References: References: <5d6222a80908261809m68c08666od2fa8aecec3dd91a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [GIT PULL] 0.10.7 stable release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wednesday 26 August 2009 09:09:23 pm Glauber Costa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Stephen > > Depooter wrote: > > There is a set of changes that have been applied to fix qemu crashes > > when the SDL window is resized.=A0 I have seen an arm specific fix ge= t > > added to master, as well as an apparently more general fix for all > > architectures.=A0 This should be applied to the stable branch as well= =2E > > AFAICT, these have only been applied to the stable branch. > > > > The email from Aug 3, "fix sdl window resize" from Stefano Stabellini= > > is the general fix. > > I fail to see how. AFAICT, Window resizing was only implemented as > part of the patch that > implemented zoom capabilities, which is not present in the stable branc= h. > > Thus, the patch you point to, fixes a piece of code that does not > exist at all in the stable > branch. How then can it be needed to fix anything you're seeing? Oh I see... I appear to be mistaken then. I had been switching back and forth betwee= n the=20 stable 0.10 branch and the master branch for a while and recal seeing the= bug=20 and changes that went in and noticed that they were not applied to all th= e=20 relevant branches. =20 Looking again, I see that the patches I refer to need to be applied to th= e=20 0.11 stable branch, not the 0.10 stable branch. Perhaps Stefano needs to push his fixes to the stable-0.11 branch as well= as=20 master. --=20 Stephen Depooter