From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgarD-0005Rs-EZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:01:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MgarC-0005R2-G5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:01:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MgarC-0005Qw-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:01:22 -0400 Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7]:55415) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgarA-0006Vk-QG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:01:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:56:05 +0100 From: Chris Webb Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [GIT PULL] 0.10.7 stable release Message-ID: <20090827085605.GE10928@arachsys.com> References: <1251291946-25821-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20090826175041.GA2221@arachsys.com> <5d6222a80908261814w62eeb5daj4b1474272dbcffc0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80908261814w62eeb5daj4b1474272dbcffc0@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Glauber Costa , aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Glauber Costa writes: > Since you effectively wrote a backport, can you re-send it with a SoB > line, and some information on the changelog telling us where and why the > differences from master occurs? Sure, no problem. I've just done this. I wasn't completely sure on the right way to format the sign-off and changelog on a backport---hope the patch header I've sent is what you had in mind here. Cheers, Chris.