All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Subject: [PATCH] atm/br2684: netif_stop_queue() when atm device busy and netif_wake_queue() when we can send packets again.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:29:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908311429.n7VETlTi000764@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251545092-18081-1-git-send-email-karl@hiramoto.org>

This patch removes the call to dev_kfree_skb() when the atm device is busy.
Calling dev_kfree_skb() causes heavy packet loss then the device is under
heavy load, the more correct behavior should be to stop the upper layers,
then when the lower device can queue packets again wake the upper layers.

Signed-off-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
---
 net/atm/br2684.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/atm/br2684.c b/net/atm/br2684.c
index 2912665..5c42225 100644
--- a/net/atm/br2684.c
+++ b/net/atm/br2684.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct br2684_vcc {
 	struct net_device *device;
 	/* keep old push, pop functions for chaining */
 	void (*old_push) (struct atm_vcc * vcc, struct sk_buff * skb);
-	/* void (*old_pop)(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb); */
+	void (*old_pop)(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb);
 	enum br2684_encaps encaps;
 	struct list_head brvccs;
 #ifdef CONFIG_ATM_BR2684_IPFILTER
@@ -142,6 +142,22 @@ static struct net_device *br2684_find_dev(const struct br
2684_if_spec *s)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+/* chained vcc->pop function.  Check if we should wake the netif_queue */
+static void br2684_pop(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct br2684_vcc *brvcc = BR2684_VCC(vcc);
+	struct net_device *net_dev = skb->dev;
+
+	pr_debug("br2684_pop(vcc %p ; net_dev %p )\n", vcc, net_dev);
+	brvcc->old_pop(vcc, skb);
+
+	if (!net_dev)
+		return;
+
+	if (atm_may_send(vcc, 0))
+		netif_wake_queue(net_dev);
+
+}
 /*
  * Send a packet out a particular vcc.  Not to useful right now, but paves
  * the way for multiple vcc's per itf.  Returns true if we can send,
@@ -200,20 +216,19 @@ static int br2684_xmit_vcc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct n
et_device *dev,
 
 	ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc = atmvcc = brvcc->atmvcc;
 	pr_debug("atm_skb(%p)->vcc(%p)->dev(%p)\n", skb, atmvcc, atmvcc->dev);
-	if (!atm_may_send(atmvcc, skb->truesize)) {
-		/*
-		 * We free this here for now, because we cannot know in a highe
r
-		 * layer whether the skb pointer it supplied wasn't freed yet.
-		 * Now, it always is.
-		 */
-		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
-		return 0;
-	}
 	atomic_add(skb->truesize, &sk_atm(atmvcc)->sk_wmem_alloc);
 	ATM_SKB(skb)->atm_options = atmvcc->atm_options;
 	dev->stats.tx_packets++;
 	dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
 	atmvcc->send(atmvcc, skb);
+
+	if (!atm_may_send(atmvcc, 0)) {
+		netif_stop_queue(brvcc->device);
+		/*check for race with br2684_pop*/
+		if (atm_may_send(atmvcc, 0))
+			netif_start_queue(brvcc->device);
+	}
+
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -503,8 +518,10 @@ static int br2684_regvcc(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc, void __u
ser * arg)
 	atmvcc->user_back = brvcc;
 	brvcc->encaps = (enum br2684_encaps)be.encaps;
 	brvcc->old_push = atmvcc->push;
+	brvcc->old_pop = atmvcc->pop;
 	barrier();
 	atmvcc->push = br2684_push;
+	atmvcc->pop = br2684_pop;
 
 	__skb_queue_head_init(&queue);
 	rq = &sk_atm(atmvcc)->sk_receive_queue;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-31 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-28 10:38 [PATCH] br2684 testing needed for packet loss and performance Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-28 12:25 ` [Linux-ATM-General] " Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2009-08-29 10:24   ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-29 11:24     ` [PATCH] atm/br2684: netif_stop_queue() when atm device busy and netif_wake_queue() when we can send packets again Karl Hiramoto
2009-08-31 14:29       ` Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) [this message]
2009-09-03  6:27         ` David Miller
2009-09-03 13:44           ` Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2009-09-10 19:49       ` [Linux-ATM-General] " Philip A. Prindeville
2009-09-10 21:30         ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-11 18:48           ` David Miller
2009-09-15 13:44             ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-15 14:57               ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-09-16 18:04                 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-09-11 19:56           ` Philip A. Prindeville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908311429.n7VETlTi000764@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
    --to=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=karl@hiramoto.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.