All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:46:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910184621.GC6421@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19112.57690.867979.462172@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:22:02PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker writes:
> 
> > Add the open() and close() callback to the pmu structure.
> > Open is called when a counter is initialized just after it's allocation
> > and close is called when the counter is about to be released.
> > 
> > These callbacks are useful for example when a pmu has to deal with
> > several registers and needs to maintain an internal list of counters
> > using them. Given such list, the pmu is able to check if the the number
> > of physical registers are still sufficient for the new created counter
> > and then accept or refuse this counter.
> 
> We already do that sort of thing on powerpc for hardware counters.
> 
> It looks to me that you can easily do that stuff in the appropriate
> xxx_perf_counter_init function, since pmu->open() is only called
> immediately on return from one the various xxx_perf_counter_init
> functions, and xxx_perf_counter_init is what says what pmu struct to
> use.
> 
> As for ->close(), that's what counter->destroy is there for.  On
> powerpc, hw_perf_counter_init sets counter->destroy to an appropriate
> destructor function, as does tp_perf_counter_init.  So if you need a
> destructor for breakpoint counters, just make bp_perf_counter_init set
> counter->destroy appropriately.
> 
> Paul.


Right. pmu->open/close is basically a mirror of *_perf_counter_init()
and counter->destroy() but in the pmu layer.

As you prefer I can indeed remove that, the end-result looks a bit
confusing to me too.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-10 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-10  8:29 [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:22   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:46     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf_counter: Export various perf helpers for external users Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:28   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:25   ` K.Prasad
2009-09-10 18:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 21:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14 21:18         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:17       ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:33         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 22:09   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14  3:41     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14  6:24       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 18:01         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:28   ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw-breakpoints: Arbitrate access to pmu following registers constraints Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:41   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 14:59       ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 15:02       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 18:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] ksym_tracer: Remove KSYM_SELFTEST_ENTRY Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 10:09 ` [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 17:23   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-10 18:24   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090910184621.GC6421@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.