From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754775AbZIKQWT (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:22:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754751AbZIKQWR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:22:17 -0400 Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:26895 "EHLO rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754666AbZIKQWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:22:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:21:57 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Pavel Machek Cc: arve@android.com, swetland@google.com, kernel list Subject: Re: newer version of HTC Dream support Message-Id: <20090911092157.ba202b0a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20090911161335.GA8137@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090824092204.GB25591@elf.ucw.cz> <20090901131832.GA1835@ucw.cz> <20090904090303.024e981a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20090911071155.GA1386@ucw.cz> <20090911075847.2fb7210a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20090911161335.GA8137@elf.ucw.cz> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.12.0; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: abhmt010.oracle.com [141.146.116.19] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4AAA7930.00E1:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:13:35 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > > With 2.6.31 being closer... is there a git tree or set of patches to > > > > > > make it boot on HTC Dream? > > > > > > > > > > > > Quite a lot of hw should be supported in linux-next, and it would be > > > > > > nice to get arch-specific code working with linux-next and eventually > > > > > > merged... > > > > > > > > > > Any news here? If you need some more kernel hackers I guess I'm > > > > > looking for a job :-). > > > > > > > > well, mmotm and linux-next dream builds fail like this: > > > > > > Ok, is the goal here to get it to compile, or get it to boot? > > > > Can you do b. (boot) without a. (compile)? > > Well, hardly, but I can do a) without b), and it is very much > easier. So... which is it? I'm only targeting compile/build. > > > I have recent tree that compiles, somewhere, but getting it to boot is > > > 'slightly more interesting'. > > > > Sure, booting is more interesting. Especially if one has the device. > > Do you have one? Nope. Hence compile/build. --- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/