From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [5/5] kbuild: Set -fconserve-stack option for gcc 4.5
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:36:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914143615.9ee47a1a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090914201811.187B3B1757@basil.firstfloor.org>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:18:11 +0200 (CEST)
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
> The upcomming gcc 4.5 has a new -fconserve-stack option
> that tells the inliner to take stack frame size in account.
> Set it if the compiler supports it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> ---
> Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak.orig/Makefile
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3-ak/Makefile
> @@ -575,6 +575,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-s
> # revert to pre-gcc-4.4 behaviour of .eh_frame
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm)
>
> +# conserve stack if available
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fconserve-stack)
Do we have any info about what effects this option has upon the
generated code? Text size changes, runtime stack usage changes, etc?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 20:18 [PATCH] [0/5] kbuild: A couple of Kbuild fixes/improvements Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 20:18 ` [PATCH] [1/5] kbuild: Fix ld-option Makefile macro to really work Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 21:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-15 13:01 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-15 15:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-14 20:18 ` [PATCH] [2/5] kbuild: Check if linker supports the -X option Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 20:18 ` [PATCH] [3/5] kbuild: Echo the record_mcount command Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 20:18 ` [PATCH] [4/5] kbuild: Fail build if recordmcount.pl fails Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 20:18 ` [PATCH] [5/5] kbuild: Set -fconserve-stack option for gcc 4.5 Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 21:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-19 9:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-20 12:04 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-14 21:43 ` [PATCH] [0/5] kbuild: A couple of Kbuild fixes/improvements Sam Ravnborg
2009-09-14 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-05 21:51 Andi Kleen
2009-08-05 21:51 ` [PATCH] [5/5] kbuild: Set -fconserve-stack option for gcc 4.5 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914143615.9ee47a1a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.