From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Updated performance results Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:07:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20090916180719.GE2641@think> References: <4A7C32A4.9070106@austin.ibm.com> <20090807231240.GD3710@think> <4A9C0D19.5010108@austin.ibm.com> <20090911192955.GB2894@think> <4AAAC2B6.8040105@austin.ibm.com> <20090914135130.GE8839@think> <4AAEB89C.3040100@austin.ibm.com> <20090916005225.GG23965@think> <4AB1010F.70001@austin.ibm.com> <4AB12702.30601@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Whitney , linux-btrfs To: Steven Pratt Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AB12702.30601@austin.ibm.com> List-ID: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > Steven Pratt wrote: > >Chris Mason wrote: > >>On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:41:48PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > >>>Only bit of bad news is I did get one error that crashed the system > >>>on single threaded nocow run. So that data point is missing. > >>>Output below: > >> > >>I hope I've got this fixed. If you pull from the master branch of > >>btrfs-unstable there are fixes for async thread races. The single > >>patch I sent before is included, but not enough. > >Glad you said that. Keeps me from sending the email that said the > >patch didn't help :-) > > > >Steve > Well, still getting oopses even with new code. > > Lots of: > Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] BUG: soft lockup - > CPU#10 stuck for 61s! [btrfs-endio-1:30250] > Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] Pid: 30250, comm: > btrfs-endio-1 Not tainted 2.6.31-autokern1 #1 IBM x3950-[88726RU]- > Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] RIP: > 0010:[] [] crc32c+0x20/0x26 If I'm reading this right, you've got a softlockup in crc32c? Something has gone really wrong here. Are you reusing datasets from old runs? -chris