All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, riel@redhat.com,
	minchan.kim@gmail.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH V1] mm/vsmcan: check shrink_active_list() sc->isolate_pages() return value.
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:02:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090922140206.293586cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251935365-7044-1-git-send-email-macli@brc.ubc.ca>

On Wed,  2 Sep 2009 16:49:25 -0700
Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> wrote:

> If we can't isolate pages from LRU list, we don't have to account page movement, either.
> Already, in commit 5343daceec, KOSAKI did it about shrink_inactive_list.
> 
> This patch removes unnecessary overhead of page accounting
> and locking in shrink_active_list as follow-up work of commit 5343daceec.
> 

I didn't merge this.  It's still unclear to me that the benefit of the
patch exceeds the (small) maintainability cost.

Did we end up getting any usable data on the frequency of `nr_taken == 0'?




From: Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca>

If we can't isolate pages from LRU list, we don't have to account page
movement, either.  Already, in commit 5343daceec, KOSAKI did it about
shrink_inactive_list.

This patch removes unnecessary overhead of page accounting and locking in
shrink_active_list as follow-up work of commit 5343daceec.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-vsmcan-check-shrink_active_list-sc-isolate_pages-return-value mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vsmcan-check-shrink_active_list-sc-isolate_pages-return-value
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1323,9 +1323,12 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
 	if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
 		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
 	}
-	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
-
 	__count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
+
+	if (nr_taken == 0)
+		goto done;
+
+	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
 	if (file)
 		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -nr_taken);
 	else
@@ -1383,6 +1386,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
 	move_active_pages_to_lru(zone, &l_inactive,
 						LRU_BASE   + file * LRU_FILE);
 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
+done:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 }
 
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-22 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02 23:49 [RESEND][PATCH V1] mm/vsmcan: check shrink_active_list() sc->isolate_pages() return value Vincent Li
2009-09-03 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-03 22:02   ` Vincent Li
2009-09-03 22:47     ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-04 21:39       ` Vincent Li
2009-09-04 23:53         ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-08 13:21           ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 22:39             ` Vincent Li
2009-09-08 23:27               ` Minchan Kim
2009-10-15 22:47                 ` Vincent Li
2009-10-15 23:13                   ` Vincent Li
2009-10-16  2:10                   ` Minchan Kim
2009-10-16  2:20                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-16  3:05                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-16  3:26                         ` Vincent Li
2009-11-26  4:56                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-09  9:59               ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-04  1:37   ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-04  2:01     ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-04  5:01       ` Vincent Li
2009-09-04 16:05         ` Vincent Li
2009-09-06 23:38           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 18:32             ` Vincent Li
2009-09-08 23:47               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-09 12:04               ` Johannes Weiner
2009-09-09 13:22                 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-22 21:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-22 23:01   ` Vincent Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090922140206.293586cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=macli@brc.ubc.ca \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.