From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738AbZI2AQI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:16:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753685AbZI2AQH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:16:07 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41660 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753668AbZI2AQG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:16:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090928.171625.04541003.davem@davemloft.net> To: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sparc64: implement page mapping percpu first chunk allocator From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4AC15182.4020603@kernel.org> References: <4ABB6C80.20109@kernel.org> <20090928.143656.208349447.davem@davemloft.net> <4AC15182.4020603@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:14:58 +0900 > Ah... great but unless you object, I think it would be better to push > it out anyway just to make things a bit more robust and ease tracking > and debugging when something goes wrong. The added code is small and > ditched once boot is complete. What do you think? That's fine with me: Acked-by: David S. Miller