From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: imre.deak@nokia.com (Imre Deak) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:33:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: add warning for invalid kernel page faults In-Reply-To: <20090928112624.GA10671@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090928092919.GA30271@localhost> <1254131304-32057-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@nokia.com> <20090928095516.GB6715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090928100048.GC30271@localhost> <20090928100442.GD6715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090928101625.GE30271@localhost> <20090928102710.GG6715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090928110158.GG30271@localhost> <20090928112624.GA10671@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20090928113327.GH30271@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:26:24PM +0200, ext Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:01:58PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:27:10PM +0200, ext Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Now you're talking about different code - the bit I quoted was what was > > > in your submitted patch, without deletion of intervening lines. There > > > was no else clause in your patch. > > > > > > Please, go back and look at your original patch. > > > > Ah, sorry. Missed that line when rebasing. I'll send an updated one. > > Now I see what you're getting at. Yes, we can make this a debugging > option, but I believe it should exhibit the right behaviour. > > In other words (and as I already covered) it should invoke the standard > no_context thing if there isn't a fixup handler in place rather than > continuing blindly on to try to handle the fault. So, it should be: > > if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) { > if (!user_mode(regs) && !search_exception_tables(regs->ARM_pc)) > goto no_context; > down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > } else { > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM > + if (!user_mode(regs) && !search_exception_tables(regs->ARM_pc)) > + goto no_context; > +#endif Ok, agreed. Do you need an updated patch? --Imre