From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.irobotique.be ([92.243.18.41]:40022 "EHLO perceval.irobotique.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901AbZI1WO6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:14:58 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: V4L-DVB Summit Day 3 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:16:43 +0200 Cc: Hans Verkuil , Linux Media Mailing List References: <200909252322.26427.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909290016.43635.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Guennadi, On Saturday 26 September 2009 14:25:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > - implement sensor v4l2_subdev support (Laurent). We are still missing > > some v4l2_subdev sensor ops for setting up the bus config and data > > format. Laurent will look into implementing those. An RFC for the bus > > config already exists and will function as the basis of this. I volunteered to port the sensor drivers we use with the OMAP3 to v4l2_subdev, implementing the missing operations/helpers/whatever on the way, but it somehow escaped my mind at the time that it included the bus config and data format operations :-) > Good, obviously, I'm veryinterested in both these APIs, and I hope Laurent > will have a look at my earlier imagebus proposal and use that API as a > basis for the data format API. My RFC, probably, didn't cover all possible > cases, but it should be a reasonable starting point with easy enough > extensibility. I did get a couple of positive feedbacks regarding that > API, and I have converted the whole soc-camera stack to it and am working > on some new drivers with that API. So far I didn't have a single case > where I would have to amend or extend it. Your RFC will be used as a starting point (actually more than a starting point, as there has been lots of discussions around it already). My plan is to reuse what's available in RFCs as-is, port the drivers, see how everything shatters to pieces (hopefully it won't :-)), and post RFCs to fix the problems if required. You will of course be included in the discussion. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart