From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from linode.davidb.org ([72.14.176.16] helo=mail.davidb.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Mt30h-0003vZ-BK for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:30:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:28:36 -0700 From: David Brown To: Matthias Fuchs Subject: Re: patented FTL format Message-ID: <20090930172832.GA4574@linode.davidb.org> References: <200909301732.35277.matthias.fuchs@esd.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909301732.35277.matthias.fuchs@esd.eu> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 05:32:34PM +0200, Matthias Fuchs wrote: >Or with other words, does a translation layer (we would also call it >differently) that allows using things like ext3 on a bare NAND chip >conflict with any patents? I'm going to guess that most of the people who know the answer to this question won't be able to talk about it. Opinions from non-legal-experts probably isn't all that useful anyway. David