Re: [PATCH 01/19] freezer: don't get over-anxious while waiting

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

> Freezing isn't exactly the most latency sensitive operation and
> there's no reason to burn cpu cycles and power waiting for it to
> complete.  msleep(10) instead of yield().  This should improve
> reliability of emergency hibernation.

i don't see how it improves reliability, but its probably ok.

Well... for hibernation anyway. I can imagine cgroup users where
freeze is so fast that this matters. rjw cc-ed.		pavel

> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/power/process.c |   13 +++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index cc2e553..9d26a0a 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool sig_only)
>  	do_gettimeofday(&start);
>  
>  	end_time = jiffies + TIMEOUT;
> -	do {
> +	while (true) {
>  		todo = 0;
>  		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>  		do_each_thread(g, p) {
> @@ -62,10 +62,15 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool sig_only)
>  				todo++;
>  		} while_each_thread(g, p);
>  		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -		yield();			/* Yield is okay here */
> -		if (time_after(jiffies, end_time))
> +		if (!todo || time_after(jiffies, end_time))
>  			break;
> -	} while (todo);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We need to retry.  There's no reason to be
> +		 * over-anxious about it and waste power.
> +		 */
> +		msleep(10);
> +	}
>  
>  	do_gettimeofday(&end);
>  	elapsed_csecs64 = timeval_to_ns(&end) - timeval_to_ns(&start);

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html