From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com ([209.85.218.210]:33209 "EHLO mail-bw0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757883AbZJLU1w (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:27:52 -0400 Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so3411456bwz.37 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:23:16 +0200 From: Richard Zidlicky To: Bob Copeland Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.31.[12] ath5k regression Message-ID: <20091012202316.GA8310@linux-m68k.org> References: <20090623174616.GA3914@linux-m68k.org> <20090623202541.GA3635@hash.localnet> <20090625083636.GA6323@linux-m68k.org> <20090705123105.GE2132@hash.localnet> <20091009143922.GA7848@linux-m68k.org> <20091010125824.GA18841@hash.localnet> <20091011122616.GA27105@linux-m68k.org> <20091011133010.GA21494@hash.localnet> <20091011220002.GA11603@linux-m68k.org> <20091011222142.M14763@bobcopeland.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20091011222142.M14763@bobcopeland.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 06:23:56PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:02 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > so the results are same like before. The printk message came once only, > > I will try to gather more debug info tomorrow. > > Meaning it works the same as with your change (replacing "chan != null" > with "true") or it works the same as mainline, i.e. it fails? it works like in mainline and fails. Richard