From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756473AbZKDPT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755926AbZKDPT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45281 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753147AbZKDPT1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:29 -0500 From: Aristeu Rozanski To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: introduce NMI_AUTO as nmi_watchdog option Message-ID: <20091104151929.GH18613@redhat.com> References: <20091103171054.GB25437@redhat.com> <20091104114630.GA16993@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091104114630.GA16993@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > NMI_AUTO is a new nmi_watchdog option that makes LAPIC be tried first > > and if the CPU isn't supported, IOAPIC will be used. It's useful in > > cases where NMI watchdog is enabled by default in a kernel built for > > different machines. It can be configured by default or selected with > > nmi_watchdog=3 or nmi_watchdog=auto parameters. > > What i'd like to see for the NMI watchdog is much more ambitious than > this: the use of perf events to run a periodic NMI callback. > > The NMI watchdog would cause the creation of a per-cpu perf_event > structure (in-kernel). All x86 CPUs that have perf event support (the > majority of them) will thus be able to have an NMI watchdog using a > nice, generic piece of code and we'd be able to phase out the open-coded > NMI watchdog code. > > The user would not notice much from this: we'd still have the > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog toggle to turn it on/off, and we'd still > have the nmi_watchog= boot parameter as well. But the underlying > implementation would be far more generic and far more usable than the > current code. > > Would you be interested in moving the NMI watchdog code in this > direction? Most of the perf events changes (callbacks, helpers for > in-kernel event allocations, etc.) are in latest -tip already, so you > could use that as a base. but that would work only for LAPIC. You're suggesting killing IOAPIC mode too? -- Aristeu