From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [rfc 0/4] igb: bandwidth allocation Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:21:23 +1100 Message-ID: <20091105022123.GA22019@verge.net.au> References: <20091105005847.941190065@vergenet.net> <9929d2390911041746g2b5f51cdia489bd87d87e41ef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck , Arnd Bergmann To: Jeff Kirsher Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:49097 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754797AbZKECVT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:21:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9929d2390911041746g2b5f51cdia489bd87d87e41ef@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:46:50PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 16:58, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this series of patches exposes the bandwidth allocation > > hardware support of the Intel 82576. It does so through > > a rather hackish sysfs entry. That interface is just intended > > for testing so that the exposed hardware feature can > > be exercised. I would like to find a generic way to expose > > this feature to user-space. > > > > Thanks Simon. I have add the 4 patch series to my tree for testing. Thanks. I wanted to get the code out rather than sitting on it for lack of a better user-space interface. Although there is a lot of fluff the actual register twiddling for bandwidth allocation turned out to be quite simple.