From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754579AbZKELLs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:11:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753936AbZKELLs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:11:48 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:38054 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753921AbZKELLr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:11:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=BlROt0agF9fsaPn7rQVggZrf82Evd5EVpQg1I2vZxZoGKQEO+pYcpJh2e5r2w/TXSp hkUhCCOYxIolaPi5u/3DF4YrGs9xfPUAexLz5F1dKsODgTi3e9D+395DL2XLpruZEpCJ /i64MM+gNrSHa2nEh8k1Pft58dzUy/Ne2cv/M= Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:11:53 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Prasad , Alan Stern , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Steven Rostedt , Jan Kiszka , Jiri Slaby , Li Zefan , Avi Kivity , Mike Galbraith , Masami Hiramatsu , Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf events Message-ID: <20091105111151.GC4877@nowhere> References: <1257275474-5285-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1257275474-5285-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <19186.45320.518439.831011@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19186.45320.518439.831011@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:03:36PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Frederic Weisbecker writes: > > > @@ -207,6 +212,15 @@ struct perf_event_attr { > > __u32 wakeup_events; /* wakeup every n events */ > > __u32 wakeup_watermark; /* bytes before wakeup */ > > }; > > + > > + union { > > + struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */ > > + __u64 bp_addr; > > + __u32 bp_type; > > + __u32 bp_len; > > + }; > > + }; > > I'm wondering why you don't use attr.config for anything with > breakpoint events? > > Paul. Because this is not sufficient to host the breakpoint parameters given from userspace. May be I'm missing something?