All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger+oe@freyther.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: what to do with wrong checksum
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:50:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911071450.30712.holger+oe@freyther.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF574B5.2010802@mwester.net>

On Saturday 07 November 2009 14:23:01 Mike Westerhof wrote:
> Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> ...
> 
> > Reluctantly updated checksums.ini
> >
> > Frans
> 
> But of course there's no magic that will remove the old cached tarball
> out of one's downloads directory when this sort of thing happens.
> (Busybox has been known to do this, too)
> 
> What do folks think we should do about that when it occurs?
> a) support two entries (old and new) in checksums.ini
> b) do nothing (leave as is)
> c) add some sort of support so that the user gets additional information
>    with the new checksum match failure explaining that the checksum was
>    updated and they need to manually remove the old (bad) tarball


Good question... currently we only check the checksum after download, a first 
start would be to do it before unpack... this would create an error and we 
could implement c) later... (e.g. by creating a old_checksums.ini)

z.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-07 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06 20:38 what to do with wrong checksum Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-07  3:06 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-07  8:45   ` Philip Balister
2009-11-07  9:06   ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-07  9:10     ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-07  9:39       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-07 13:23     ` Mike Westerhof
2009-11-07 13:50       ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther [this message]
2009-11-07 14:42       ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-07 16:38         ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-07 18:00           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-07 19:01             ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-07 20:14               ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-07 14:41 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-07 22:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-07 22:11   ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-08 12:23   ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-11-08 13:19     ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-08 14:08       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-08 14:20         ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-08 14:43           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-11-08 14:59           ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-08 14:55         ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-08 15:40           ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-08 21:31             ` Graham Gower
2009-11-08 22:26               ` Przemyslaw Wesolek
2009-11-08 14:09       ` Philip Balister

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200911071450.30712.holger+oe@freyther.de \
    --to=holger+oe@freyther.de \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.