[01/99] fs: pipe.c null pointer dereference

* [01/99] fs: pipe.c null pointer dereference
  2009-11-06 22:18 ` [00/99] 2.6.31.6 stable review Greg KH
@ 2009-11-06 22:13   ` Greg KH
  2009-11-06 22:14   ` [02/99] pci: increase alignment to make more space for hidden code Greg KH
                     ` (98 subsequent siblings)
  99 siblings, 0 replies; 104+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2009-11-06 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: stable-review, torvalds, akpm, alan, Earl Chew

[-- Attachment #1: fs-pipe.c-null-pointer-dereference.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3651 bytes --]


2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Earl Chew <earl_chew@agilent.com>

commit ad3960243e55320d74195fb85c975e0a8cc4466c upstream.

This patch fixes a null pointer exception in pipe_rdwr_open() which
generates the stack trace:

> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 RIP:
>  [<ffffffff802899a5>] pipe_rdwr_open+0x35/0x70
>  [<ffffffff8028125c>] __dentry_open+0x13c/0x230
>  [<ffffffff8028143d>] do_filp_open+0x2d/0x40
>  [<ffffffff802814aa>] do_sys_open+0x5a/0x100
>  [<ffffffff8021faf3>] sysenter_do_call+0x1b/0x67

The failure mode is triggered by an attempt to open an anonymous
pipe via /proc/pid/fd/* as exemplified by this script:

=============================================================
while : ; do
   { echo y ; sleep 1 ; } | { while read ; do echo z$REPLY; done ; } &
   PID=$!
   OUT=$(ps -efl | grep 'sleep 1' | grep -v grep |
        { read PID REST ; echo $PID; } )
   OUT="${OUT%% *}"
   DELAY=$((RANDOM * 1000 / 32768))
   usleep $((DELAY * 1000 + RANDOM % 1000 ))
   echo n > /proc/$OUT/fd/1                 # Trigger defect
done
=============================================================

Note that the failure window is quite small and I could only
reliably reproduce the defect by inserting a small delay
in pipe_rdwr_open(). For example:

 static int
 pipe_rdwr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
       msleep(100);
       mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);

Although the defect was observed in pipe_rdwr_open(), I think it
makes sense to replicate the change through all the pipe_*_open()
functions.

The core of the change is to verify that inode->i_pipe has not
been released before attempting to manipulate it. If inode->i_pipe
is no longer present, return ENOENT to indicate so.

The comment about potentially using atomic_t for i_pipe->readers
and i_pipe->writers has also been removed because it is no longer
relevant in this context. The inode->i_mutex lock must be used so
that inode->i_pipe can be dealt with correctly.

Signed-off-by: Earl Chew <earl_chew@agilent.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 fs/pipe.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -777,36 +777,55 @@ pipe_rdwr_release(struct inode *inode, s
 static int
 pipe_read_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
-	/* We could have perhaps used atomic_t, but this and friends
-	   below are the only places.  So it doesn't seem worthwhile.  */
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
 	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-	inode->i_pipe->readers++;
+
+	if (inode->i_pipe) {
+		ret = 0;
+		inode->i_pipe->readers++;
+	}
+
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int
 pipe_write_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
 	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-	inode->i_pipe->writers++;
+
+	if (inode->i_pipe) {
+		ret = 0;
+		inode->i_pipe->writers++;
+	}
+
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int
 pipe_rdwr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
 	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-	if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
-		inode->i_pipe->readers++;
-	if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
-		inode->i_pipe->writers++;
+
+	if (inode->i_pipe) {
+		ret = 0;
+		if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
+			inode->i_pipe->readers++;
+		if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
+			inode->i_pipe->writers++;
+	}
+
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 104+ messages in thread