From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabor Gombas Subject: Re: RAID 6 Failure follow up Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:09:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20091109080910.GE18545@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> References: <4AF6D0A9.6000901@gmail.com> <4AF6D461.3050109@gmail.com> <4AF6D5FD.2010602@gmail.com> <4AF70791.9080007@sauce.co.nz> <4AF741A9.80701@gmail.com> <4AF74D39.3000304@sauce.co.nz> <7d86ddb90911081845j675818a2vec1a5bd26d542024@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d86ddb90911081845j675818a2vec1a5bd26d542024@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ryan Wagoner Cc: Richard Scobie , Andrew Dunn , Linux RAID Mailing List List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:45:40PM -0500, Ryan Wagoner wrote: > This is interesting to hear as I have been using smartmontools on my > Supermicro LSI 1068E controller with the target firmware for 2 years > now on CentOS 5. I have 3 RAID 1 arrays across 2 drives, a RAID 5 > drive across 3 drives, and a RAID 0 across 2 drives. [...] > uname -r > 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 Kernel version matters. With 2.6.22 we only got occassional complaints that the drives are not capable of SMART checks that were not true but were otherwise harmless. With 2.6.26 and 2.6.30, the controller offlines the disks. Gabor -- --------------------------------------------------------- MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences ---------------------------------------------------------