From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bug #14622] Second IDE device not found Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:05:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091119.120550.183823935.davem@davemloft.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38771 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755330AbZKSUFd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:05:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, zdavatz@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:37:47 +0100 (CET) > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14622 > Subject : Second IDE device not found > Submitter : Zeno Davatz > Date : 2009-11-11 17:31 (6 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125796105822353&w=4 We're going to need more information to diagnose this. And linux-ide should have been at least CC:'d from the very beginning. >>From what I can discern the problem is introduced somewhere between 2.6.27 and 2.6.31, you have a Serverworks CSB5 and primarily the issue is that attaching or detaching your CD-ROM driver influences whether both of your disks are properly detected. Correct? You seem to have played around with using the IDE layer vs. the ATA layer. Can you see any difference in behavior if you try using just the IDE layer vs. just the ATA layer with the 2.6.31 kernel? Thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bug #14622] Second IDE device not found Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:05:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091119.120550.183823935.davem@davemloft.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, zdavatz@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:37:47 +0100 (CET) > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14622 > Subject : Second IDE device not found > Submitter : Zeno Davatz > Date : 2009-11-11 17:31 (6 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125796105822353&w=4 We're going to need more information to diagnose this. And linux-ide should have been at least CC:'d from the very beginning. >From what I can discern the problem is introduced somewhere between 2.6.27 and 2.6.31, you have a Serverworks CSB5 and primarily the issue is that attaching or detaching your CD-ROM driver influences whether both of your disks are properly detected. Correct? You seem to have played around with using the IDE layer vs. the ATA layer. Can you see any difference in behavior if you try using just the IDE layer vs. just the ATA layer with the 2.6.31 kernel? Thanks.