From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nALAl4XD017745 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:47:05 -0600 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 08D221BB5E31 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3JdtcJCcacO3FMqU for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (unknown [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5166AC00AC3 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:47:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2397783C824 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:49:06 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:47:09 +0100 References: <200911201152.43809@zmi.at> <4B0708C5.7000307@houseofnate.net> In-Reply-To: <4B0708C5.7000307@houseofnate.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911211147.09368@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2751952240855841603==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============2751952240855841603== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1423993.oadIMYekuh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1423993.oadIMYekuh Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Freitag, 20. November 2009 Nathaniel W. Turner wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is your NFS client also running a 64-bit > kernel? Yep. I've used 64bit since years, as AMD has that since a long time in=20 all their CPUs (there have just been some Semprons 32bit only). And now=20 since every PC has >3GB RAM it's nearly a must. mfg zmi =2D-=20 // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 --nextPart1423993.oadIMYekuh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAksHxS0ACgkQzhSR9xwSCbTsPACgmhX308ZEI0buR6nYn89WTdO/ XrAAnA1J6DS9MopHriWc6fcaSaikvmJV =u2qm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1423993.oadIMYekuh-- --===============2751952240855841603== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============2751952240855841603==--