From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935332AbZLPVMF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:12:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757545AbZLPVME (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:12:04 -0500 Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:36960 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757536AbZLPVMB (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:12:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:11:58 -0700 From: Alex Chiang To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Yinghai Lu , Kenji Kaneshige , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bjorn Helgaas , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Ivan Kokshaysky , torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] pci: update pci bridge resource to get more big range for devices under it - v13 Message-ID: <20091216211158.GF26757@ldl.fc.hp.com> References: <4AFCFC0D.4030002@kernel.org> <4AFD19DA.7010602@jp.fujitsu.com> <4AFE6F39.5080505@kernel.org> <4B0B321E.4010103@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B0B335E.1070809@kernel.org> <4B0B3C13.9030502@jp.fujit!su.com> <4B0C69AD.3030106@kernel.org> <4B0D13EB.9010403@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B10D286.4020607@kernel.org> <20091216125458.42bf222e@jbarnes-piketon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091216125458.42bf222e@jbarnes-piketon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Yinghai, * Jesse Barnes : > > > > -v13: change resource_list to resource_list_x, to save size and flags > > aside, otherwise grandchild res will get confused with son's res as > > could be used One difficulty that I have in reviewing is the multiple patch revisions buried deep within a thread. Blame my small brain for not being able to keep track of all the revision-as-mail-responses in one coherent body of work. > Patches 4-6 make me the most nervous, since they have the potential of > really changing our resource allocation (hopefully for the better) on > many platforms. > > Linus, can you check them out and see if you're ok with the direction? > > Patches 7-9 seem like they've recieved some review from Alex and > Kenji-san, but I don't see acks or reviewed-bys on them. > > Alex and Kenji-san, are you ok with them assuming the previous patches > or something like them go upstream? Can you please repost your next revision (after taking Jesse's review comments) in a new thread? Thank you. /ac