From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #01; Mon, 04) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:40:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20100105064013.GB19025@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vljgei7rs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vskal5c11.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Tay Ray Chuan , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 05 07:40:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NS35a-0003DT-BL for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:40:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750789Ab0AEGkR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:40:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751201Ab0AEGkR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:40:17 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:48946 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177Ab0AEGkQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:40:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 28288 invoked by uid 107); 5 Jan 2010 06:45:01 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:45:01 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:40:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vskal5c11.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:57:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * tr/http-push-ref-status (2009-12-24) 6 commits > Daniel and Jeff commented on the earlier rounds; is everybody happy with > this v3? If so let's move it to 'next'. If not, please complain. I just posted a few comments, but I suspect the response will just involve Tay explaining why I'm wrong or confused. :) So no serious objections, but let's wait for this round of discussion. -Peff