From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/12] PCI PM: Make it possible to force using INTx for PCIe PME signaling Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:02:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20100106220214.GA25366__44238.3639784113$1262815444$gmane$org@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200912272057.10443.rjw@sisk.pl> <200912272102.22775.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100106135625.14b37f10@jbarnes-piketon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100106135625.14b37f10@jbarnes-piketon> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Linux PCI , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Francois Romieu , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:56:25PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > This scares me a little... seems like we're not restoring some state on > resume that's needed for MSIs to work? Looks fine though. Yeah, that was my concern. We debugged this a little on IRC and didn't get anywhere, though, so probably need to find someone who knows more about MSIs... -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org