From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753207Ab0AHMOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:14:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752856Ab0AHMOT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:14:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:53934 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518Ab0AHMOT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:14:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=N9jqmecnr2Ypj1V9JnpFyPRhB0QQIioV2E3UIfShKMBmHPJqnLPLZbwSUDHt4o/KPB /4zLnrbNugHbrQwh3VyFkIj1GnizhSBQeyVRdiZpnDgcl4OPQpzmTlIXTvdgCynnF8+1 M0AYLaeCRVw7t7okKHGFyZwZZ7oHY5+oHValE= Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:14:14 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jesse Brandeburg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array Message-ID: <20100108121414.GB4967@lenovo> References: <1262951595-1729-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1262951595-1729-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1262951595-1729-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:53:14AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > use radix_tree irq_desc_tree instead of irq_desc_ptrs. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > > --- > kernel/irq/handle.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "internals.h" > @@ -127,7 +128,23 @@ static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, s > */ > DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock); > > -static struct irq_desc **irq_desc_ptrs __read_mostly; > +static RADIX_TREE(irq_desc_tree, GFP_KERNEL); > + > +static void set_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + radix_tree_insert(&irq_desc_tree, irq, desc); > +} > + > +struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq) > +{ > + return radix_tree_lookup(&irq_desc_tree, irq); > +} > + > +void replace_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + radix_tree_delete(&irq_desc_tree, irq); > + radix_tree_insert(&irq_desc_tree, irq, desc); > +} > ... Hi Yinghai, should not we printk\warn if radix_tree_insert() is get failed? This is hardly (if ever) happen on machines with small number of interrupts allocated but anyway. Or I miss something? -- Cyrill