From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753451Ab0AKNUZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:20:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753309Ab0AKNUZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:20:25 -0500 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:39169 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753306Ab0AKNUY (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:20:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:20:22 +1100 From: Simon Horman To: Marin Mitov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [BUG?]Section mismatch dmar_ir_support() Message-ID: <20100111132022.GC5198@verge.net.au> References: <201001082127.22685.mitov@issp.bas.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001082127.22685.mitov@issp.bas.bg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ PCI list and maintainer CC added ] On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote: > Hi all, > > Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed, > but still not fixed:-) > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21 > > Sure I could be missing some other postings :-) > > Who could take care of it? And should we? I've been wondering about that too. The patch seems correct to me.