From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:12:13 +0000 Message-ID: <20100119221213.GB11920@shareable.org> References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws> <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anthony Liguori , john cooper , "Przywara, Andre" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM list To: Chris Wright Return-path: Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:37604 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755091Ab0ASWMb (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:12:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chris Wright wrote: > * Anthony Liguori (anthony@codemonkey.ws) wrote: > > I'm very much against having -cpu Nehalem. The whole point of this is > > to make things easier for a user and for most of the users I've > > encountered, -cpu Nehalem is just as obscure as -cpu > > qemu64,-sse3,+vmx,... > > What name will these users know? FWIW, it makes sense to me as it is. 2001, 2005, 2008, 2010 :-) -- Jamie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXMJP-0000Jc-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:12:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXMJK-0000J5-Nq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:12:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52434 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXMJK-0000J2-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:12:30 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:44940) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NXMJJ-0002RR-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:12:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:12:13 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. Message-ID: <20100119221213.GB11920@shareable.org> References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws> <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chris Wright Cc: john cooper , "Przywara, Andre" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM list Chris Wright wrote: > * Anthony Liguori (anthony@codemonkey.ws) wrote: > > I'm very much against having -cpu Nehalem. The whole point of this is > > to make things easier for a user and for most of the users I've > > encountered, -cpu Nehalem is just as obscure as -cpu > > qemu64,-sse3,+vmx,... > > What name will these users know? FWIW, it makes sense to me as it is. 2001, 2005, 2008, 2010 :-) -- Jamie