From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:27:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20100125112758.GB3536@shareable.org> References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws> <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4B563144.9030803@codemonkey.ws> <4B576311.3030906@redhat.com> <20100120202634.GA20754@redhat.com> <20100121002509.GM3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4B57AB66.30802@redhat.com> <4B586D4A.50207@codemonkey.ws> <4B5D5F84.4040507@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anthony Liguori , "Przywara, Andre" , KVM list , john cooper , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chris Wright , Gerd Hoffmann To: Dor Laor Return-path: Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:53702 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009Ab0AYL2G (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:28:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5D5F84.4040507@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dor Laor wrote: > x86 qemu64 > x86 phenom > x86 core2duo > x86 kvm64 > x86 qemu32 > x86 coreduo > x86 486 > x86 pentium > x86 pentium2 > x86 pentium3 > x86 athlon > x86 n270 I wonder if kvm32 would be good, for symmetry if nothing else. -- Jamie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZN79-0006f8-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:28:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZN73-0006aK-Ub for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:28:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45896 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZN73-0006a8-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:28:09 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:39310) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZN73-0004Mg-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:28:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:27:58 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. Message-ID: <20100125112758.GB3536@shareable.org> References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws> <20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4B563144.9030803@codemonkey.ws> <4B576311.3030906@redhat.com> <20100120202634.GA20754@redhat.com> <20100121002509.GM3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4B57AB66.30802@redhat.com> <4B586D4A.50207@codemonkey.ws> <4B5D5F84.4040507@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B5D5F84.4040507@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dor Laor Cc: "Przywara, Andre" , KVM list , john cooper , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chris Wright , Gerd Hoffmann Dor Laor wrote: > x86 qemu64 > x86 phenom > x86 core2duo > x86 kvm64 > x86 qemu32 > x86 coreduo > x86 486 > x86 pentium > x86 pentium2 > x86 pentium3 > x86 athlon > x86 n270 I wonder if kvm32 would be good, for symmetry if nothing else. -- Jamie