From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752539Ab0AZIqw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:46:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751973Ab0AZIqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:46:51 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:43866 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575Ab0AZIqu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:46:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:46:41 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Antonino Daplas , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/29] move acornfb's probe function to .devinit.text Message-ID: <20100126084641.GB20792@pengutronix.de> References: <1264189758-7197-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1264278937-19675-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20100123232813.GB4146@x200> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100123232813.GB4146@x200> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:25:58 +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > gods, can you just send one patch for all framebuffer drivers? Well, I thought one logical change per changeset is the favourite way to go. And as the people Cc:d are different I think most people prefer it this way. On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:28:13AM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:35:09PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > -static int __init acornfb_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > +static int __devinit acornfb_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > Even more, if this function is marked __devinit, some other functions > can very well be marked __devinit, can you do this? Probably, the big pro after my patch is that modpost can warn about this. Actually this applies to all (initially) over 50 patches in this series. If you take my patches, squash them together and fix all called functions, I'm happy, too. If you don't I might come back to this and do it myself. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |