From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: SOLVED: Re: Issue with pv_ops Kernel 2.6.31.6 and Xen [yinghai@kernel.org: [PATCH 01/35] x86: fix sci on ioapic 1] Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:41:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20100217194135.GJ2861@reaktio.net> References: <4B7C3AF8.2070000@goop.org> <20100217192028.GI2861@reaktio.net> <4B7C452F.2020204@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B7C452F.2020204@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Marcial Rion , xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Michael D Labriola , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 02/17/2010 11:20 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: >> I believe xen/next uses the new APIC setup stuff, so it requires Xen 4= .0.0 >> hypervisor. Correct? >> =20 > > Right. > >> iirc earlier there was a patch on xen-devel to support the new APIC st= uff with Xen 3.4 hypervisor. >> >> Was it this patch?: >> http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-3.4-testing.hg?rev/608ebc959c35 >> =20 > > Looks like it. Has that made it into any release versions of 3.4? > Not yet.. it'll be in 3.4.3. -- Pasi