From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Franky Van Liedekerke <liedekef@telenet.be>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:56:40 +0000
Subject: Re: PATCH: Access priority
Message-Id: <20100217235640.10f04938@telenet.be>
List-Id: <mlmmj.mlmmj.org>
References: <4B5D7A55.4090302@yahoo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B5D7A55.4090302@yahoo.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:40:57 +0100
Morten Shearman Kirkegaard <moki@fabletech.com> wrote:

> > - if the third flow is choosen, don't call the new keyword plain
> >   "send", call it eg. "force-send" or "bypass-mod" or so. People
> > tend to like descriptive keywords :-)
> 
> Why break a tradition og choosing ambiguous keywords? ;-)

hehheh ... try walking on the dark side of life once :-)
 
> > - whatever flow is choosen, I find it very nicely explained and want
> >  this ASCII art in a README :-)
> 
> Patch attached. Will that do?

yup, it describes the current workflow just fine.

Franky